David Holzman's Diary

1967

Comedy / Drama

0
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 91%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 76%
IMDb Rating 6.5 10 1628

Please enable your VPN when downloading torrents

Get VeePN VPN

Synopsis


Uploaded By: FREEMAN

Director

Cast

Eileen Dietz as Penny Wohl

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by gavin6942 6 / 10

A Curiosity

This fake documentary (which appears quite real on the surface) is about a young man making a movie about his everyday life and discovering something important about himself and his reality. Again, this film is not a real documentary... or is it? Personally, I don't think this is a great film. Even in its short run time, it has a lot of fluff. But I do think it has a certain level of brilliance in that it does appear to be a real documentary, even crediting the actors under false names. Also, it does offer a nice reflection on the role of film, bringing up some ideas expressed by Godard and others.

I can see how a film like this could be used to launch a career, but in and of itself, it really is nothing too exciting and really more of a curiosity.

Reviewed by jboothmillard 5 / 10

David Holzman's Diary

I saw this film in the book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die and that was a very good reason to watch this for me, but I saw a critics review give it a low rating which I found a little surprising, but I was still going to watch it and see if it deserved some kind of recommendation, from debuting director Jim McBride (The Big Easy). Basically this is a realistic spoof documentary about a man living on his own documenting his life every day and almost every hour, while filming himself David Holzman (L.M. Kit Carson) is discovering important things about himself. While he is filming himself, detailing every major or minor thing that has happened during a day and asking questions about himself and the world, he is causing some problems in whatever personal life he has, including his girlfriend walking out on him. Every scene of this film is from the perspective of the camera that he uses, we see him using it in some photographs as well, he uses it a lot in his own house, and he is not bothered what people think as he takes it everywhere with him, often using interesting alternative angles to capture his movement. It is towards the end of the film though that he questions his sanity and his reason for beginning his film diary in the first place, he knows that he is creating problems for his life and that it would be a greater benefit for himself and everyone to end the film entirely, and get rid of it afterwards, so he does. Also starring Eileen Dietz as Penny Wohl, Lorenzo Mans as Pepe, Louise Levine as Sandra, Michel Lévine as Sandra's Boy Friend and Robert Lesser as Max - Penny's agent. I can see it is clearly an experimental film and it was considered rather daring for its time, I guess the reason the critics give it a low rating now is because it seems a little dated, but you can't argue that has given some directors good ideas for camera movement and angles in future filmmaking, and it has a good performance by Carson who is fascinating filming himself, overall I agree it is a satire film to be seen. Worth watching!

Reviewed by Quinoa1984 9 / 10

a true indie, a wicked shoe-string satire at 24 fps

David Holzman's Diary comes close to the "dream" of what was possible in the ideal of the American independent cinema of the 1960s. Taking the lessons of John Cassavetes with Shadows and French new wave filmmakers, specifically Godard and Truffaut, Jim McBride decided that shooting a narrative with a documentary approach- following the characters hand-held, without the artifice of a constricting studio- wasn't quite enough to get at a really personal cinema. At the same time his film is something of a cunning, if not always obvious, attack on "personal docu-style" essay movies. The idea that anyone can get a camera and make a movie or something on film about their lives has now mutated into something else with reality TV (True Life on MTV is like a professional extension of David Holzman's Diary), but at the time this was something extraordinary to attempt. And even today, it still shows.

This doesn't mean David Holzman's Diary is perfect, but then how could it ever be? Or would anyone in their right mind think it should be? It's imperfections are part of its... I won't say charm, since the film isn't exactly "charming", but it's got a certain something to it by having some longer takes, some shots or moments that are extended on David Holzman going on and on to the camera about his life, or what little there is of it. It's got that randomness of a diary, of anything popping into one's head put down on record. And that aspect, about film being "truth 24 frames a second, is one of the strongest things about it. It's message is both clear and hard to take: film is something that creates a reality of its own, as the male interviewee says, that a person can't have their own reality because of an aesthetic addition or distraction to it.

This won't be news to anyone who's seen docu-horror films like Blair Witch Project or Diary of the Dead, but the difference here is that of high-minded artistic aspirations. David Holzman is a filmmaker already, so to make a film about himself, mostly with him in his apartment pondering things like Vincente Minelli or Truffaut's comment on a woman's flicking of a wrist like Debbie Reynolds, it's bound to be pretentious. The trick is to know that McBride is mocking this particular high-and-mighty artist who does have some good intentions, while at the same time making a very personal kind of film. Seeing McBride and Michael Wadleigh's camera going down a block, put to the local radio station, then going past old people's faces in close-up in a park or going by a cop who may or may not know a "film" is being shot, is incredible on-the-fly material. That or just Holzman shooting out of the window as a voyeur on another woman in an apartment reveals as much about the character as the filmmaker making the film within the film. Did I mention that Holzman, long before the semi-tragic ending, shoots the television at night one frame every single cut and then puts all the frames together? It's awe-inspiring and breathtaking.

Might sound confusing, but it's worth it to take the experience if you know what you're getting, which is an experiment as much as a essay-style narrative. This doesn't mean all the performances are very good (I liked the woman in the car very much, the girl playing Penny or the male guy being interviewed not so much), but some moments, some truly cinematic experiences come out of it. 9.5/10

Read more IMDb reviews

0 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment